What Do You Think About the “REAL ID” Requirement to Fly Domestically in the U.S.?

 In just a short time, Americans will need to carry a “REAL ID” compliant form of identification to board domestic flights. This federal requirement, first passed as part of the 2005 REAL ID Act, has been delayed multiple times but is now on track for enforcement. For many, it raises the question: Is this a necessary step for national security, or an overreach of government into our everyday lives?

The REAL ID is essentially a state-issued driver's license or identification card that meets stricter security standards set by the federal government. These standards include more thorough identity verification processes and specific physical features to prevent tampering or forgery. Without it—or an alternative like a passport—you won’t be allowed past TSA checkpoints for domestic air travel.

Supporters argue the change is long overdue. In a post-9/11 world, identity verification is a key component of national security. They say the REAL ID helps prevent terrorism, fraud, and illegal immigration by tightening the standards for who gets access to secure areas, including airport terminals. It also creates uniformity in identification, reducing loopholes across states.

However, critics raise valid concerns. First, there’s the matter of privacy. Creating a federally standardized ID, even if issued by the states, fuels fears of a national database or surveillance system. Others point out the practical difficulties: many Americans still don’t have a REAL ID, and confusion around what qualifies as compliant remains widespread. There’s also concern for lower-income citizens or seniors who may struggle to gather the documents required to obtain one.

In principle, ensuring secure and trustworthy identification makes sense. But the rollout of the REAL ID has been plagued by delays, poor communication, and a lack of public awareness. For a law passed nearly two decades ago, the implementation still feels rushed and unclear for many travelers.

So what do I think? I believe the REAL ID could be a useful tool, but only if it’s implemented with respect for civil liberties and equal access. The government must ensure that the process is fair, transparent, and does not create undue barriers for ordinary citizens. It’s not the concept of secure ID that’s controversial—it’s how it’s done.

What about you? Are you ready for REAL ID—or do you see it as one more hassle in an already complex travel system?